EV Charging Power Solution

Application

Description

High-efficiency power semiconductor solution for Level 2 and DC fast charging stations with SiC and IGBT technology.

Core Advantages

SiC Technology Leadership Advanced SiC MOSFETs and diodes enable highest efficiency and power density in charging applications
Wide Voltage Range Supports all EV battery voltages from 200V to 1000V with automatic output adjustment
Bi-directional Power Enables V2G applications for grid stabilization and energy arbitrage
Modular Scalability Modular architecture allows easy scaling from residential to commercial charging power levels

Recommended Bill of Materials (BOM)

Item Part Number Description Quantity Datasheet
1 SKM600GB12T4 High-power IGBT module for PFC and inverter stages 📄 Download
2 SKM100N120SIC SiC MOSFET for high-frequency DC-DC conversion 📄 Download
3 SKM200GB12T4 IGBT module for medium-power charging modules 📄 Download
4 SKM100N60MOS Low-voltage MOSFET for auxiliary power supplies 📄 Download

Applications

Level 2 AC Charging
DC Fast Charging
Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G)
Fleet Charging
Highway Charging Stations

Technical Specifications

Input Voltage
380V-480V AC (3-phase)
Output Voltage
200V-1000V DC
Output Power
7kW to 350kW
Efficiency
>98% (peak)
Power Factor
>0.99
T H D
<5%
Operating Temperature
-40°C to +85°C

Customer Success Stories

ChargeTech Solutions

EV Charging Infrastructure | 150kW DC Fast Charging Station

Challenge

The customer needed a high-efficiency power solution for 150kW DC fast charging stations deployed across highway corridors. The system required 98%+ efficiency to minimize operating costs, wide output voltage range (200-1000V) to support all EV models, and high reliability for 24/7 operation in harsh outdoor environments.

Solution

We provided a complete power semiconductor solution using SiC MOSFETs for the DC-DC stage and IGBTs for the PFC stage. The SiC devices enabled 50kHz switching frequency, reducing magnetic component size by 40%. Advanced thermal management with liquid cooling ensured reliable operation at 50°C ambient.

Results

The charging station achieved 98.5% peak efficiency, reducing power losses by 30% compared to silicon-only designs. The compact design enabled installation in space-constrained highway locations. Field reliability exceeded 99.5% uptime over two years of operation.

FAE Expert Insights

D

Dr. Thomas Weber

Senior FAE - Power Systems

15 years

Professional Insights

Key considerations: SiC technology is essential for >98% efficiency; Gate drive design critical for SiC reliability; Thermal management limits maximum power capability; EMI filtering challenging with high dv/dt SiC devices; Bi-directional operation requires additional protection. Common pitfalls to avoid: Insufficient negative gate voltage for SiC turn-off; Inadequate thermal design for continuous operation; Missing protection for bi-directional power flow; Insufficient EMI filtering for regulatory compliance; Poor layout causing parasitic oscillations.

Key Takeaways

  • SiC technology is essential for >98% efficiency
  • Gate drive design critical for SiC reliability
  • Thermal management limits maximum power capability
  • EMI filtering challenging with high dv/dt SiC devices
  • Bi-directional operation requires additional protection

Decision Framework

Decision Framework
Steps:
  1. Determine power level and voltage requirements
  2. Select appropriate device technology
  3. Design gate drive and protection
  4. Plan thermal management strategy
  5. Validate efficiency and reliability

Ready to Implement This Solution?

Contact our FAE team for design support and quotes

Contact Us Now

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is SiC preferred over silicon for EV charging?

SiC provides three key advantages for EV charging: First, SiC MOSFETs have lower switching losses, enabling higher switching frequencies (50-100kHz vs 20kHz for silicon). This reduces passive component size and cost. Second, SiC devices have lower conduction losses at high temperatures, maintaining efficiency as the system heats up. Third, SiC's higher thermal conductivity and wider bandgap enable higher temperature operation, improving reliability. The combination of these factors enables 98%+ system efficiency, compared to 95-96% for silicon-based designs. For a 150kW charger, this 2-3% efficiency improvement saves 3-4.5kW of power loss, reducing operating costs and cooling requirements.

For new designs above 50kW, SiC is recommended for best efficiency. Contact our FAE team for cost-benefit analysis.

How do I design for bi-directional V2G operation?

Bi-directional V2G design requires several considerations: 1) Use fully controllable switches (MOSFETs or IGBTs) in all positions - no diodes in the main power path

2) Implement dual-loop control for both directions with appropriate current limiting

3) Add protection for both power flow directions including reverse polarity

4) Consider isolation requirements for grid connection

5) Implement grid synchronization for AC output

6) Plan for reactive power capability if required by grid codes. The control algorithm must seamlessly transition between charging and discharging modes. Safety is critical - implement hardware protection independent of software control.

Design for bi-directional operation from the start. Implement comprehensive protection for both directions.

What thermal management is needed for fast charging stations?

Thermal management depends on power level and environment: For 7-22kW Level 2 chargers, natural convection or forced air cooling is usually sufficient. For 50-150kW DC fast chargers, forced air with large heatsinks is typical. For 150kW+ ultra-fast chargers, liquid cooling is usually required. Key considerations: 1) Design for worst-case ambient temperature (50°C for outdoor installations)

2) Account for altitude derating (air density decreases at altitude)

3) Consider solar loading for outdoor installations

4) Plan for dust and contamination in cooling air

5) Monitor device temperatures and implement thermal derating. Liquid cooling enables higher power density but adds complexity and maintenance requirements.

Use forced air cooling up to 150kW. Consider liquid cooling for higher power or compact designs.